Quantcast
Channel: Comments on: GMO Dangers, Scientific Evidence
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 8 View Live

By: Michael

Two-year rat studies always run into the high dose/short term vs. low dose/long term problem. Since we cannot routinely afford long, prospective studies, we often expose animals under the following...

View Article



By: arjay001

What about everything that has HFCS in it? HFCS is made from GMO corn. Sounds like a labeling nightmare. Did you really vote for it?

View Article

By: Xeno

New food labels are printed frequently, so there is no nightmare. You really voted to keep everyone from finding out if HFCS made from GMO corn is making people sick?

View Article

By: arjay001

If the label says “This product contains GMO and may be harmful to you health”, people may choose the one labeled “NO GMO”. The nightmare would be the impact on sales. What if this labeling went nation...

View Article

By: Xeno

I’m a capitalist who also cares about human rights and optimal health. If you make a product that tastes good and is good for people, it should sell well. If your product makes people sick it can go to...

View Article


By: Xeno

Anyway, “and may be harmful to your health” was NOT part of the labeling requirement in prop 37. The requirement in the text of the law is for the words “genetically engineered” or “may be partially...

View Article

By: SidHumanist

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691512007867

View Article

By: Xeno

Giving it a quick skim, nothing in this letter to the editor convinces me that the Séralini GMO study was flawed. It first makes the point that there could be a conflict of interest. This is quite...

View Article

Browsing latest articles
Browse All 8 View Live




Latest Images